The caption to the image below is: “This is the graph the record industry doesn’t want you to see.”
Why not?
Because, says Times Labs Online which prepared it, “compiled from a PRS for Music report and the BPI,” it make two things clear >>>
- that the growth in live revenue shows no signs of slowing; and,
- that live is by far and away the most lucrative section of industry revenue for artists themselves, because they retain such a big percentage of the money from ticket sales.
And hopefully, says the article, “this analysis … sheds some factual light on the claims and counter-claims that are paranoically sweeping across the music industry establishment, not least that put forward by the singer Lily Allen in this paper recently – and the BPI – that artists are losing out as a result of the fall in sales of recorded of music.”

Even more striking, perhaps, is the discovery that, “revenues accrued by artists themselves have in fact risen over the past 5 years, despite the fall in record sales,” says Times Labs, continuing >>>
It’s interesting too that, overall, industry revenues have grown in the period – though admittedly not by much – which arguably adds strength to the notion that, when the BPI releases its annual report claiming how much ‘the music industry’ has suffered from the growth in illegal file-sharing, what it perhaps should be saying is how much the record labels have suffered.
“For other people in the industry, not least artists, the future arguably holds more promise,” it adds.
Jon Newton
November 14th, 2009 at 5:55 am
Live music performances also have an online analogue.
See: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sabrina/the-lp-project-help-sabrina-make-an-album
You can use Kickstarter as a contingent funding mechanism for a non-live performance, i.e. a studio performance where the studio recording is then delivered as a FLAC copy to each participant, but COPYLEFT (e.g. CC-ShareAlike).
1) The artist is paid, and delivers their work to those fans who paid for it
2) The fans have paid, and receive what they want in exchange
3) If there aren’t enough fans or the performance doesn’t happen no-one pays anything, no-one gets anything.
4) The fans still have their liberty to share the recording they’ve paid for with their friends (or on BitTorrent), or even to sell it or play it on the radio (without royalty).
Now that’s what I call an ETHICAL ALTERNATIVE to copyright.
If no artist finds it offensive I suggest it is listed as an online business model approved by both artists and fans in the Consensus area (along with the traditional ticketed live venue performance).