<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;9 out of 10 dentists&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://a2f2a.com/2009/11/12/9-out-of-10-dentists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://a2f2a.com/2009/11/12/9-out-of-10-dentists/</link>
	<description>The net&#039;s first, and only, artists-to-fans-to-artists blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:57:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://a2f2a.com/2009/11/12/9-out-of-10-dentists/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://a2f2a.com/?p=829#comment-744</guid>
		<description>&quot; Filesharing or buying? Which is cause and which is effect? Or are they both independent of one another? These are the sort of questions I feel people should be asking.&quot;

 They&#039;re being mentioned.
 They&#039;re just being ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Filesharing or buying? Which is cause and which is effect? Or are they both independent of one another? These are the sort of questions I feel people should be asking.&#8221;</p>
<p> They&#8217;re being mentioned.<br />
 They&#8217;re just being ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://a2f2a.com/2009/11/12/9-out-of-10-dentists/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://a2f2a.com/?p=829#comment-726</guid>
		<description>One possibility to me is that the people who fileshare music are among those more interested in music per se, and therefore more likely to be willing to spend money on CDs.

Of course there would have to be a limit-- those really obsessed with music from other people could not spend more than a set amount, which is where the filesharing sometimes enters the picture.

Which came first for a music connoisseur? Filesharing or buying? Which is cause and which is effect? Or are they both independent of one another? These are the sort of questions I feel people should be asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One possibility to me is that the people who fileshare music are among those more interested in music per se, and therefore more likely to be willing to spend money on CDs.</p>
<p>Of course there would have to be a limit&#8211; those really obsessed with music from other people could not spend more than a set amount, which is where the filesharing sometimes enters the picture.</p>
<p>Which came first for a music connoisseur? Filesharing or buying? Which is cause and which is effect? Or are they both independent of one another? These are the sort of questions I feel people should be asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan.F</title>
		<link>http://a2f2a.com/2009/11/12/9-out-of-10-dentists/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan.F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://a2f2a.com/?p=829#comment-705</guid>
		<description>I think that the timing can at least be partly explained due to the fact that while the internet allowed file sharing, it also provided information. People now know that the record companies are charging exorbitant fees, giving hardly anything to artists and generally screwing them over. Buying music directly from artists online or through appropriately priced download stores like amazon is the way forward. Record companies have to realise that the only reason they were so profitable before was because of their own deceit and greed, and now that avenue is gone for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the timing can at least be partly explained due to the fact that while the internet allowed file sharing, it also provided information. People now know that the record companies are charging exorbitant fees, giving hardly anything to artists and generally screwing them over. Buying music directly from artists online or through appropriately priced download stores like amazon is the way forward. Record companies have to realise that the only reason they were so profitable before was because of their own deceit and greed, and now that avenue is gone for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
