You know how impressionable kids can be, so it’s simple.
Get ‘em while they’re young. That’s corporate goal Number One with penetration of school classrooms around the world now a matter of routine.
Unscrupulous marketeers know the value of corrupting children at the earliest possible opportunity, getting into their heads with flashy ads and mind-worm soundtracks, as Microsoft demonstrated in a school in Pennsylvania.
It “forced a bunch of middle schoolers in Pennsylvania to learn, and perform,” Jonathan Mann’s Bing song, says TechCrunch.
‘Bing’ is Microsoft’s answer to advertising giant Google’s search engine.
“The horror,” said the story, going on, “It’s hard to watch this without immediately thinking about parents who accept money to allow their child to be sponsored. Is this the future of branding?
“Mann actually sent us the video along with the following note: ‘I literally cried a little bit when I saw this video. On the one hand I’m happy I was able to provide some kids with an excuse not to do school work for a few hours. On the other hand, not sure how I feel about these kids being indoctrinated into the cult of, well, whatever. It’s kinda creepy … ‘ ”
It’s more than creepy. It’s criminal. But what else is new?
Intellectual Property merit badges
All segments of the entertainment industry have been getting away with this kind of thing for years with corporate indoctrination specialists masquerading as ‘educators’ even using movements such as the Scouts to carry their specious messages.
“Funny thing,” said Rafael Venegas three years ago in a comment post to a p2pnet.net story highlighting the fact Hollywood had weasled its way into the Hong Kong Boy Scout movement.
“You put two USA lawyers in opposing sides of any infringement lawsuit and they can’t agree on how to interpret the law and its frequently contradictory jurisprudence,” said Rafael. “They can’t even agree on what infringement is. And someone expects some kids in China to have knowledge of IP law’?”
No only China. Soon afterwards, the MPAA proudly announced Los Angeles Scouts would be expected to ‘earn’ Intellectual Property merit badges.
And the corporate record industry came under fire, “after launching a scheme to teach primary schoolchildren — possibly as young as five — not to illegally download music from the internet,” said Britain’s the Daily Mail, recently
“Lessons teaching pupils about copyright law are already being piloted in six schools and could be rolled out across the country,” but, ”Critics suggest the initiative is designed to protect commercial interests rather than provide a valuable educational experience.”
The get ‘em while they’re young child mind-rape scheme was organised by music industry ‘consultant’ Ruth Katz — who also works for EMI, said p2pnet. But no worries because she’s, “funding the school scheme independently,” although by another amazing coincidence, she’s backed by music industry organisations, “including the EMI Music Sound Foundation — a charity set up by the label to improve music education,” says the story.
This particular travesty is happening in Britain, but it’s no more than part of an overall entertainment industry campaign to warp the minds of children everywhere by introducing copyright and intellectual property law into classrooms.
Much more recently, Hollywood sent “one of its biggest guns” to New Zealand in a “last-ditch attempt to persuade the Government to beef up its proposed approach to tackling internet piracy,” said stuff.co.nz.
“The corporate movie and music industries are spending millions of dollars in an international campaign to browbeat governments into instituting three strikes laws which would threaten alleged file sharers with two warnings, and then have them thrown off the Internet,” said p2pnet adding:
“With the governments acting as corporate copyright cop agencies, ISPs would be the enforcers.
However, as with Britain, the US, Australia and other countries where Big Music and Hollywood are struggling desperately to have their business plans adopted as local laws, the cartels are meeting with fierce on- and offline resistance from civil rights groups and citizens.
“ ‘Washington-based executive vice-president and chief policy officer Greg Frazier held discussions with officials in an attempt to persuade the Government to rethink its plan to water down section 92a of the Copyright Act, which was put on hold in March following a storm of protests from internet advocates’,” said stuff.co.nz.
Not only but also, he, “launched a ‘comic book’ driving home the association’s anti-piracy message, which will be distributed to 17,000 children at cinemas throughout New Zealand during the school holidays”.
Thank God we home-school our daughter.
Click here for more on how the music and movie industries are warping and twisting the minds of our children.
Jon Newton
October 31st, 2009 at 10:26 am
That video made me cringe on more than one level. Who produced that, Uwe Boll? I would have guessed Ed Wood if he wasn’t deceased.
October 31st, 2009 at 11:46 am
I daresay an artist has pangs of conscience when they allow their art to be corrupted by commerce, especially as so many artists treat each of their published works as a child they’ve set loose to fend for itself in the big wide world, that they pray eludes the clutches of advertisers and other cultural abusers.
But, then artworks aren’t actually children.
How much worse it must be when instead of your art it is your actual child that you are allowing to be polluted?
The school and parents must be getting a shed load of money to fund an indoor swimming pool or something. They couldn’t possibly be swayed by a couple of free sweatshirts and branded rucksacks… could they?
October 31st, 2009 at 3:53 pm
@Crosbie:
“They couldn’t possibly be swayed by a couple of free sweatshirts and branded rucksacks… could they?”
Who says they’re getting anything?!
(Even the shirts.)
These corporates, riding the wave of propaganda they created themselves, come into it saying their messages add to the scope of the education system. If they’re bribing anyone, it would those in charge of letting them in.
I’m sure everyone else is “immaterial”.
October 31st, 2009 at 3:55 pm
The prevailing question here is did they learn enough about IP to demand a royalty? (sarcasm intended) I used to live in Bentonville, AR – home of the Wal-Mart corporation. One year the school board decided it was necessary to have all the children wear identity badges as a means to ward off gang activity in the schools. Bentonville is hardly a center for urban street activity. The badges looked suspiciously like Wal-Mart employee badges. I informed the school board that if the teachers in the school could not identify their own students, they were not doing their job. My children would not be wearing badges of any sort. If they were not provided an education as a result, it would end up in court. The school board backed off and made it voluntary. Within a month, nobody was volunteerng. This video is a disgusting example of corporate greed and misuse of public educational facilities. It is indeed a part of the Horsham, PA public school system and not a private enterprise. Jonathan Kircher, principal of Keith Valley Middle School states “It is our school’s ultimate goal to make learning meaningful to students every day and for students to be able to learn in a safe, respectful, and caring environment.”
Kerchner’s email is provided here for anyone who wishes to offer comments on what meaningful learning is.
http://www.hatboro-horsham.org/kvms/site/default.asp
October 31st, 2009 at 5:53 pm
I see those kinds of things, and I always have a strange
feeling that I’m stuck inside of some John Waters’ film.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:07 am
” That video made me cringe on more than one level. Who produced that, Uwe Boll? I would have guessed Ed Wood if he wasn’t deceased. ”
you owe me a new keyboard pal
( watched ‘In the Name Of The King’ just yesterday )
November 1st, 2009 at 10:51 am
@ DA:
Sure they get to keep the T-shirts, and the pens, and the notepads, and all the other associated junque. And administrators have by default given Micro$oft the OK to use the school for further MS ‘education’ programmes, paid for by state and federal taxes. It’s Win-Win all the way for Micro$oft.
And let’s not forget the video itself or, of course, the musical mind-worm …
Cheers!