Oct 30

Hi all: This is long-winded,  so please accept my apologies in advance. :)

a2f2a.com  is here and now, and it’s most definitely happening.

But it isn’t entrepreneurial. Rather, it’s a genuinely collaborative effort to break through the wall of insanity the corporate record labels have erected in their efforts to gain total control of how music is distributed, and by whom, online. And a lot of work has gone into putting this site together, and is still going into it.

Chris Ovenden over in the UK did 85% of the coding — building the engine, as it were. He’s a musician and a writer, and the father of two young boys, who supports himself as a programmer. And I know for a fact he isn’t rolling in money.

He isn’t, however, getting paid for all the time and effort he’s putting into a2f2a.

Devil’s Advocate plays keyboard, and he’s a graphic artist. He’ll be boiling down the posts in the different categories so we can see where we’re going. That’ll be a lot of labour.

But he isn’t being paid for it and right now, he isn’t working.

Billy has put his credibility, his money (he’s forking out for a2f2a’s hosting) and lot of time into this — just check out the number of Bragg responses to comment posts. And I know more than one pro artist of his acquaintance think he’s totally crazy for getting involved with a2f2a.

But he’s doing it, and he’s the first high-profile artist that I know of who’s been willing to go to these kinds of lengths because he truly believes we’re all part of the same mix, and we if don’t help each other to straighten things out, no one else will.

My day job, so to speak, is running p2pnet.net, a digital media advocacy and news site I founded. The ads on the site, plus regular donations from an anonymous sponsor, are my sole source of income and every month I wonder if I’m going to make it through to the next month. It’s been like this for nine years and I feel like public radio without the fund raisers. ;)

I’m also a musician and at one point in my life, I was involved with a band which supplied a substantial part of my then income. So I know what it’s like to be on the road at night, and holding down a job during the daytime.

I’m not getting paid either, and with a2f2a, my daily workload has increased by at least 25%.

a2f2a is a commitment, and a huge one. I wouldn’t be doing it if I didn’t believe in it, and I know the same goes for Billy, Chris and DA, and 99.9% of the people who’ve registered and who contribute with their thoughts and suggestions.

For myself, I may not be getting paid, but a2f2a (and p2pnet, for that matter) are giving me something that’s worth more than money: the satisfaction of being intimately involved in a initiative which really is an initiative, and which stands an excellent chance of making a powerful, and positive, difference to a lot of people at a time when the powers-that-used-to-be are doing their utmost to make life miserable for everyone.

Sometimes, we do things because they need to be done — to make them happen. And a2f2a is happening.

Are you listening Artists? Are you listening Recording Companies?

Billy Bragg isn’t the only famous artists who’s contributing to a2f2a. Jack Ely, the voice on Louie Louie which is, without any shadow of a doubt, one of the most famous classic rock ‘n’ roll records of all time, was the second to come on board.

He said this a few days back, and I make no apologies for repeating it >>>

Blah, blah, blah, complain, complain, complain! This is all the fan hears these days from the artists and recording companies. They are really starting to sound like a broken record, pardon the pun. Their complaining has become so constant in the ears of the fans that it is now just a big YAWN!

Can’t anyone just shut those greedy bastards up? They can’t stop file sharing so why don’t they just stop trying? And the biggy….Who cares!

Let’s face it people, file sharing is here to stay. There is nothing anyone can do about it. It is just a fact of life. The more the government tries to get involved, the sillier they look. In fact, if a file sharing entity is really aggressive about their company and they get shut down by the U.S. government, they can just license someone in China or Iran to run their site and tell the U.S. where to get off.

Are you listening Artists? Are you listening Recording Companies?

There is not one single thing you or anyone else can do to stop file sharing from the internet other than shut down the internet all together.

So, get it through your thick skulls, file sharing can’t be stopped, period. There is an idiom from many decades ago and it still rings true today. If you can’t fight them, join them.

Now that you’ve got that straight, what can be done about it to make everything fair for the artists and recording companies? Plenty. I would be remiss if I presented a problem and didn’t simultaneously present a solution, so here goes.

We have to get one thing straight first, though. These solutions only apply to artists who don’t have to rely on loops and punch-ins to make them sound good. These solutions apply to artists that can perform great in front of a live audience, because after all, records were originally made in order to preserve the essence of a live recording.

Now let’s get on with solutions. First, the artist and recording company have to agree to a partnership wherein the artist does his/her thing and the recording company becomes primarily a promotion agent. In other words, after the recording is made, the artist agrees to share the profits of his live gigs with the recording company and the recording company agrees to share the profits of music product sales with the artists. Got it people? Artists and Record Companies are now partners, not adversaries. Partners who share and share alike! And that means everything; writing, publishing, costs, everything. Look at it this way. The two really do need each other. A song unrecorded is just sitting there not making anyone a cent. An artist, just playing in his/her bedroom and occasionally playing a club, isn’t promoting their songs to very many people and won’t get known very easily or quickly that way. Your friends can only buy your song so many times before they get tired of the same ol’, same ol’.

Ok, ok, I’ll get back to the solutions. First, the Record Company might find it advantageous to contact a file sharing entity and run a banner ad on their site for one or more of their artists, thereby promoting those artists’ recordings and attracting people to download and become familiar with them and want to go see them in person. Yes?

Second, Artists and Recording Companies might partner on web sites and share the recordings there themselves, this way eliminating the need for file sharing sites, and becoming able to keep track of the number of hits a particular track gets. This kind of data is very valuable to promotion entities such as Recording Companies. They could then promote a show as having ‘XYZ, the most downloaded artist of the year’ or month or week, etc.

Third, Artists and Recording Companies can partner together on live gigs. I know, I know there are promoters and others involved, but just remember, if it weren’t for the Artists and Recording Companies, there wouldn’t be a gig at a large venue, so those local promoters just need to get over themselves. Also, if you want the biggest bang for your promotion buck you need to include a DJ or two in on the gig promotion. There is nothing, not any kind of advertising, which promotes live gigs faster than ‘buzz,’ and who creates the buzz in a local area? The DJ. So get one from the largest demographic station in the area which plays your genre, and ask him to join your little group. Remember one thing, in fact this should become the mantra for the entire industry, ‘20 PERCENT OF SOMETHING IS FAR GREATER THAN 90 PERCENT OF NOTHING.’ Repeat after me, ‘20 percent of something is far greater than 90 percent of nothing.’ Got it? Good.

One other thing.

Back in the day, I looked at the competition and thought about what I would want if I was going to a show/dance. I realized that the most important thing was to have the largest crowd. I saw that having 300 people show up to something in a 1500 person capacity dance hall wasn’t much fun. So, I started throwing 99 cent dances. Sure enough, those paying $1.25 somewhere else would prefer to come to a .99 dance. Consequently the places were packed, everyone had a wonderful time, and my band became known as the one that had the biggest parties and could draw the most people. What a deal. I realize that those prices seem ridiculous by today’s standard, but the point is that if you give the public a deal, they will come almost every time. They love a deal.

I’m sure there are many other ways you can think of to come up with self enhancing partnerships that will promote your careers. It’s time to start focusing on what can be done instead of whining about file sharing which you can do nothing about. So remember, ‘20 percent of something is far greater than 90 percent of nothing’ and go for it. If you work hard together, don’t succumb to discouragement and are persistent, there is nothing you can’t accomplish, together.

Stay tuned.

Jon Newton

3 Responses

  1. minuskelvin Says:

    Recorded media is an anomaly of the 20th century. It has negatively impacted our culture from such a fundamentally deep level that it is overlooked by almost everybody. Just as we can’t imagine life without an equal-temperament diatonic scale, a recent invention, we simply have no idea what it must have been like to live pre-edison and pre-monoculture. Think about what it must have been like to go to a live show in 1787. Think about what it must have been like to live in a culture where the majority of people played music in some capacity, i.e., had a personal experience of music other than recorded media.

    With this backdrop, I can’t underscore enough how much the pop-cultural media was simply destroying our very humanity. We are inherently creative creatures. It has been argued recently that music was even the driving factor for our language, which was the driving factor for our brain growth development. Music main be more core to our being than we even know. Living in a society where the majority of people experience music as something only other, “more talented” people engage in, no wonder depression is out of control.

    With this said, it is a fundamentally good thing that we are potentially returning toward a more egalitarian viewpoint of music. If it is impossible to make MEGA bucks from music by selling to everybody in our culture, then people will get it out of their heads as a dream. People will stop approaching music with the dream of being the next mega-pop-king-of-media-demi-god. And perhaps there will be fewer guitar players. On Fresh Air this week, Carly Simon was discussing in an interview that she was depressed for many years when she couldn’t compete with her former pop-icon self. The music she was making was undoubtedly brilliant, yet it didn’t “sell” anymore. However, during the interview she was and positive energized about the new musical landscape and discussed new possibilities in the new world. More than the new avenues for distribution, in essence, you are no longer viewed as a failure if you fail to drown your culture in your music.

    As a parallel note, and not unrelated to mega-pop-demi-gods, recorded media have also been detrimental to society from the point of view of virtuosity. Though classical and jazz music couldn’t possibly rival more pop-oriented music with it’s draw-dropping potential for culture-drowning wealth, it has created a parallel situation. Only the most virtuoso of virtuoso could possibly hope to eke out a decent living as a musician (not uber-rich, mind you, just wealthy enough to “not worry”). As a jazz musician myself, who has performed in many places and with many bands, and yet no virtuoso, I’ve met many nearly virtuosic musicians. Musicians who in any normal measure of the capabilities of a human being, are pretty damn amazing. Yet, they are living by the seat of their pants: there are almost no regular venues to perform in (most of the real jazz venues are taken by the mega-virtuosos), and they are often driven to perform in weddings (and play 80s music, etc), or are forced to go into music education. Music education would be a fantastic job, if it weren’t for the ridiculous expectations of our culture brought on by pop culture and recorded media.

    I do think that virtuosity is a good thing and should be what we as musicians strive for. The issue is excessive virtuosity in recorded media at the expense of our culture’s everyday experience and relationship with music. Wynon Marsalis is truly phenomenal to be sure, but if we compare ourselves to him, we shall never make a single note. For most, the peak is too high, the steps too many. Humility is key, but it also helps if it is possible to play trumpet well (but not like Wynton), and make a respectable living.

    In conclusion, musicians (and would-be musicians) should give up notions of going “big”, even in Japan. We should get on with making great music that they really care about and that we can all experience and share. We should return to learning and creating music for music’s sake (and art!) and strive to live in an age when a teenager defines their style not by the music they listen to but by the music they make. If we can do that, there will be a greater diversity in musical taste and expression. More experimentation, bigger minds. More musicians with which to collaborate with. And if all this happens, there will be a LOT more people who will be able to make a respectable living in music. And by respectable I don’t mean pimp-my-house-respect. I mean normal jobs like nursing, teaching, auto repair, etc. Heck, if a couple of really amazing musicians get uber famous in this future eutopia world make it big, do they really need to make more money than professors, doctors, lawyers, presidents, and god?

    So I say, who cares about file-sharing! In fact, it should be encouraged. Times, they are a changing.

  2. inkysmudge Says:

    Amen to that.

  3. Barnowl Says:

    I agree with a lot of the above comments as regards the artist need to be paid.

    But the stumbling block is the record companies and there associations who both claim they are doing what they do for the artists, but in reality they are doing it for themselves.
    Trying to keep the old business model afloat so they keep total control on how and how much we pay for the music.

    So far I have not heard anybody from the music business complain about when music became digitised and we music fans re-brought our vinyl on CD so everybody got paid twice for the same piece of music and the again when us fans brought it again on remastered CD or anniversary editions for those extra few tracks which 9 times out of 10 were not worth it.

    So this is some of the reasons why we the record buying public feel we get rip it off.

    Again this whole problem started off because the industry ignored the inter-net for many years. All they did was moan and started to sue there customers, further alienating the customer.

    They try to tell us there are now plenty of legal ways to get our music on line. But can you explain this how can to by a physical CD costs me £6.98 from Amazon and to buy the mp3 version from Amazon would cost me £6.99 a penny more for a product which is inferior in sound quility than the CD. Where is the incentive in that, so if I want an inferior copy then why not download it from P2P.

    I am a big music lover and if I like an artist I will go and buy his music and thanks too the inter-net I have found many artist that I would have never have heard.
    But it has also saved me from making some big mistakes and saved my money to spend on the artists I like and feel I should support.

    There will always be people out trying to get something for nothing but the true music fan will always support music by buying it on CD going to see the artist live.
    So I feel the biggest threat to artists not getting paid is not piracy but your own industry.
    The industry should have looked at models like Alofmp3 to see that if they had a model like this they could have made themselves and the artists lots of money.

You must be logged in to comment.